This Is: After-Photography 1839/1851/1880/1975/1980

jacquardloom01medium-2.jpg

We are experiencing direct impact from technology upon the technical structures of the medium, potentially undermining the photograph’s status as we have come to know it over a hundred and sixty years. This unique and special status – this prescient index is wobbling.

Mexico in Three Dimensions: Underwood and Underwood’s Stereographic Images

credit Underwood & Underwood (LC-USZ62-89220)

Sets of stereographic images, and the stereoscopes needed to view them, were ubiquitous objects in Victorian drawing rooms. In Techniques of the Observer, Jonathan Crary refers to the stereoscope as a “quintessentially nineteenth-century device” (59) that operated in a very different way from earlier technologies including the camera obscura.

An Elegy for the Object of Photography

"Fertility" © Matt Smolinsky

Editors note: This article grew out of a collaboration between artist and critic, but also between brother and brother. It started during the artist's graduate studies when, forced with the task of building a logical and in-depth critical framework for his photography, he asked his brother the writer and critic for help. What the critic Mike Smolinsky can offer in this case, and what makes this piece rather unique in its field, is an intimate knowledge of the artist going all the way back to his birth. Despite this unlimited background information, however, the essay is not a biographical piece about an artist. This is an essay about the process of making art, about "the act of looking," and specifically about whether or not the documentary mode of making art—the primary act of Matt Smolinsky for the past 15 years—has any relevance at all in today's post-postmodern world.

To Transform Destiny Into Awareness

© Mat Thorne

I recently asked some friends what they would grab from their houses if it was on fire and they had only three minutes to escape. This question has intrigued me for some time. I can’t remember when I first thought of it—or maybe it was put to me at a dinner party by a host desperate to get things rolling. Regardless, I am curious about what people find important, and this question speaks directly to the issue. It is, too, I confess, a self-serving question, as I am trying to figure out what is important to me and am hoping someone will help me down that path. Anyway, my friends on this afternoon answered typically. Of the four, three said they would grab the family photographs. The holdout said he’d reach for his guitar. Guitars aside, in my unscientific poll, most people say they would most miss their photographs if all their belongings were irretrievably lost.

The Task of the Viewer is to Surrender to the Image: Applying Translation Theory to Thomas Dworzak’s Taliban, Part 2

Image © Thomas Dworzak / MAGNUM Editor's note: This is the second half of a two-part article. Part one can be read here. In The Politics of Translation, Gayatri Chakravorty Spivak’s theses explore the nuances of the relationship that exists between the translator and the text during the process of translation.

Sell Gold, Buy Hitler

warholitler.jpg

Finally, a symbol so clear, so convincing, so telling of the state of the arts today that even the ostriches with their heads in the sand can see it. Hitler, yes the Hitler, is hot as hell.

The Existence of Art

I had a weird thought the other day. It was about art and it came out of nowhere. Specifically, I wondered if I cared about it at all. To be perfectly candid, I wondered if it really even exists. In the past, I’ve had similar thoughts, usually they’re about love, God or the sub-conscious (though I know the latter, the sub-conscious, probably put me off it’s own trail, just to prove a point). I’ve thought about it quite a bit since then, both the “do I care about” question and the “does it even exist” question.

It's the Economy, Stupid!: Photography and the Art of Representation in the Age of Reagan

untitled-cowboy.jpg

Since at least the announcement of the Daguerreotype in 1839 by the medium's original self-promoter Louis Daguerre, the medium of photography has been a cultural and technological phenomenon in a modern world. Photography is and always has been a powerful force in people's lives, and never more so than today. Images are tied to culture, are in our DNA, and have become inseparable from politics, economics, and social issues. Photography comes to us in 2009 with a rich and complex history, and photographic images are born into a world that gives them context and meaning. Images have become the ultimate mass media, crossing language barriers and being transmitted to the furthest corners of the planet in fractions of a second.

A Complete Idiot's Guide to Jack Kerouac

kerouacbook.jpeg

Every once in a while a book comes along that seems to symbolize all that is wrong with the publishing industry (if not the world of art and culture at large). There are books that are actually so ‘bad’ that their publication creates something not just worthless but actually harmful to society. You’re a Genius All the Time, by Chronicle Books, Regina Weinreich and the so-called Jack Kerouac Estate, is just such a book.

site by Sevenbay